Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human quality
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein (talk) 18:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Human quality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Is this saveable from Original Research? Has existed since 2006 and hasn't come to much. Camillus (talk) 13:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete looks more like a dictionary definition than anything else. Also, did you notice the vandalism done just before the afd? Reverted now. BananaFiend (talk) 14:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete can't make up my mind whether this is a neologism or not, but there is no source to this combination of words. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with the way it is now.
The topic does seem to have some opportunity for rewriting into a legitimate article though.TecmoBo (talk) 03:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply] - Comment Actually, maybe it doesnt. I just searched the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Philosopher's Index, and Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and there wasn't one hit on the topic. Virtually none even mentioned the phrase "human quality" in the context the wiki article does. My philosophy teacher taught me all wrong! Any chance this topic more commonly goes by another name? As far as I know the topic is a philosophical concept. TecmoBo (talk) 04:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.