Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Rights in NSW

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Icewedge (talk) 02:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Human Rights in NSW[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Implicitly contested prod. Opinion piece. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 19:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or blank to a one-sentence stub. Potentially a notable topic but this article is hopelessly and unsalvageably POV and original research, both of which are valid grounds for deletion. --Mkativerata (talk) 22:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete POV only.--Grahame (talk) 00:36, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- per WP:NPOV. N2e (talk) 18:47, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Because the lack of content and reliable sources is not sufficient enough to meet guidelines. Western Pines (talk) 03:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a POV disaster. I don't see that a decent article could be written about this subject, although perhaps there could be a brief mention in Human rights in Australia. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:02, 13 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per Lankiveil Nick-D (talk) 05:58, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.