Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human-Form Replicators

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge with Replicator (Stargate). Deathphoenix ʕ 16:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Human-Form Replicators

Delete. ~~Describes the events of an episode that may already have an article on Wikipedia; if so, perhaps a redirect.~~ Utterly unreferenced. WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. — Mike • 20:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Follow-up on vote: Covered quite adequately in Fifth (Stargate) and in episode links that branch off that article. I don't think it'll be searched for enough for a redirect to be useful. So, removing "perhaps a redirect" from my vote. — Mike • 20:55, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Leave. The main Replicator article calls for it to be simplified and cleaned up. This is the natural solution.

Edit This article is in need of revision, however, every human form replicator's aricle features the same information, again and again. The Replicator main article is cluttered as is, and there is certainly plenty of information to include here. Kashami 20:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fancruft. Merge into another article if you must. --Rehcsif 21:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Replicators. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 22:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Replicator, there is just no need for an article about one particular form of a villain in an SF television show. - Motor (talk) 23:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Replicator, the two basic types of Replicator never separated from each other significantly in the show (there were always regular Replicators hanging around the human-form ones and working together) so there's no need for a separate article. Bryan 23:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above reasoning. -- Alfakim -- talk 12:37, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect It's a short article and will never get any longer, so might as well just be a section in the bigger article. --Tango 15:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per Tango. Lockesdonkey 18:50, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge either works, but this is definietly not fancruft Tobyk777 01:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect Merge makes sense, as they're still just a subcategory of Replicators. Biscuit Knight 07:56, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Replicators. Konman72 11:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Replicator (Stargate) as suggested a few times already. ;-) Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.