Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huma Batool

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huma Batool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Batool might not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines (and for person particularly). It is important to demonstrate the subject's significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources that are independent of the subject. From the article, it's hard to see if the subject meets the criteria for notability. BoraVoro (talk) 07:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete but I'm up for changing that vote in a second if someone can come up with decent Urdu RSes. WP:BEFORE yielded the above mentioned three sources as the most likely candidates. However, the BBC piece is an interview, the Daily Ausaf likewise, so neither counts towards WP:GNG. The Startup Pakistan piece, if it's not advertorial, is pretty shameful journalism, "Ms. Huma Batool, a born leader and a dynamic personality... a woman who has a great passion for her profession, she is an inspiration not only for Pakistani women but across the globe. She is awarded numerous awards for her services. She is a writer, and a poetess, and has immense fondness for English, Persian and Punjabi mystic poets." we are told - which is all mildly emetic. However, she founded an airline and is the first Pakistani female so to have done. And so we could argue presumption of notability if it wasn't for the sheer lack of reliable, independent sources out there. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:10, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

She received coverage in different news papers few of the references are as below:

[1] [2] [3]

  • Comment: Google Translate version of the Urdu Wikipedia [1] article.
--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 23:13, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Google translate version of Insight 3's links above:
I'm unimpressed by the latter 2.
I still haven't found anything substantial but it may be WP:TOOSOON - the airline is just getting started.
--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 23:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 13:33, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not seeing notability with what's given above. TOOSOON probably. Oaktree b (talk) 15:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.