Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hum Sab Ka Pakistan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and redirect. Fram (talk) 15:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hum Sab Ka Pakistan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. No gnews or gbooks hits. The first two pages of google yield nothing. Guerillero | My Talk 07:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I totally agree to this view here but atleast provide some other sources which could provide notability for this topic...--Dude7190 (talk) 10:41, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Added two sources, found by this trick Night of the Big Wind _talk 13:08, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Neither of those links pass WP:RS --Guerillero | My Talk 15:20, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - LOL, for most albums it is sufficient to proof that the album exists. Night of the Big Wind _talk 19:10, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - AfD isn't about the existence of something, it is examining if it passes the WP:GNG or a WP:SNG. For albums, the SNG is just a redirect to the GNG. To pass the GNG there needs to be several reliable sources. Seeing that the sources that you added are shaky at best, the page does not pass the GNG. --Guerillero | My Talk 20:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Since when? SL93 (talk) 22:11, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - I agree with the above editors that a) neither of these links are RSs (I've tagged them as questionable in the article, given our stated concerns in that regard); and b) that Night's statement that "for most albums it is sufficient to proof that the album exists" is not accurate.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - Are you following me around, Eppie? Night of the Big Wind _talk 16:56, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        He PRODed the article; it should be assumed that he keeps on watching it --Guerillero | My Talk 18:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        
        Night—You, for reasons I cannot fathom, ask whether I am following you around. By the edit history of the article, clearly the opposite is the case here (as elsewhere). I first PRODed the article. You then removed the PROD, with your first edit to the article. Minutes later. This is in line with your admission that you are following me around.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:41, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources. SL93 (talk) 22:11, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I had PRODed this article. Night of the Big Wind removed the PROD. For further background re this pattern, see here. I would have AfD'd it, had nom not beat me to it. The subject fails to meet GNG or our more specific notability criteria. Night's above statement that "for most albums it is sufficient to proof that the album exists" does not appear to be a true one, as pointed out by the above editors. I'm disturbed that with the above background, Night as he admits following my edits across the project, only to !vote against my PRODs and AfDs on bases such as this one.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:52, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of obvious notability. If we have an album by a notable artist, it's that much closer to itself being notable - but we still need proper sourcing. Once deleted, though, I think a redirect to the artist's article is warranted - so Redirect to Alamgir (pop singer). UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Redirect The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines. I believe a redirect is warranted to Alamgir (pop singer) though. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 20:42, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Redirect - Lack of coverage in reliable third party sources, doesn't pass WP:GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 14:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect: to Alamgir (pop singer) for now. Can always be split if sources are found for general notability. --lTopGunl (talk) 00:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.