Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hum Bhi Akele Tum Bhi Akele

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator; one delete vote from before new sources were added. (non-admin closure) Tol | Talk | Contribs 18:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hum Bhi Akele Tum Bhi Akele[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film, fails WP:NFILM as only things found in a WP:BEFORE are film database sites, promotional material, and articles about the actors appearing in the film...no reviews or anything else of substance.

PROD removed because "There is no need for deleting this page. References citations are adequately provided in the page", but all references cited are about a trailer for the film being released, articles about the actors, or notifications of the film being released. No (non user/non blog) reviews cited or found. Donaldd23 (talk) 11:48, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 11:48, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 11:48, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not enough to pass WP:GNG and/or WP:NFILM. Kolma8 (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Added 3 full-length reviews from IE, Firstpost, and Cinema Express. Should be enough to pass WP:NFILM. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:33, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per Ab207. It's a relatively new film and more reviews should appear. But, two reviews in first post and Indian express is sufficient to keep it even now. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:20, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per above. Sources seem enough now to qualify NFILM. Riteboke (talk) 17:17, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the article has been improved with details of three reviews in reliable sources Indian Express, First Post and Cinema Express which is part of The New Indian Express. Therefore WP:GNG and WP:NFILM are passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the article now have reviews from National Herald, Indian Express, and Times of India. Enough to pass WP:NFILM. SunDawn (talk) 11:12, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for all the new sources. I believe this film passes now. Nomination withdrawn. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:35, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.