Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hughes pr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hughes pr[edit]

Seems to have limited notability, no third-party sources. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 23:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep The Advertiser piece is fluff, but the second piece which reflects an award they won, may make them notable. Other RS coverage is trivial under 'Hughes PR' and ghits are non-existent under the other names. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 04:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the award was a Bronze for "Best Public Relations Campaign" back in 2004, and that was more or less a local newspaper-like award. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 06:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response, that's why I said weak. I've asked a friend in the Adelaide area if she knows of any coverage through her access to some of the papers' archives that google hasn't yet indexed. Failing that I'd change to delete. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 11:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{talk to me} 16:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Canley (talk) 23:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge relevant information to Edelman (firm) -- Mattinbgn\^talk 00:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't see anything of value in there. -- Mark Chovain 02:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Absolutely non-notable PR company, self-promotion presumably attempting to increase its own public relations presence via Wikipedia. Murtoa (talk) 02:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails to assert notability (the articles are fairly stock-standard padding)--Yeti Hunter (talk) 10:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, awards seem minor at best, no other real indications this is a notable company. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete An ad with no encyclopedic usefulness. ChessCreator (talk) 03:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. —Moondyne click! 09:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.