Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hua Hsu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hua Hsu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the article being around for nearly five years, no-one has found any evidence that the guy is notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Both a Google and Yahoo! search found very few links aside from one of his reviews, Facebook, and other sites that don't meet biography guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 22:10, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not apparent. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Lacking third party sources, this makes him a freelance journalist, and that does not make him notable.Curb Chain (talk) 08:06, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just one freelance writer among thousands. Doesn't qualify for biography. kakya (talk) 13:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.