Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hu Xingdou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ST47 (talk) 18:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hu Xingdou[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real showing of notability. The two links given in the article are now both dead links. And article was written by a now banned user (Arilang1234 (talk · contribs)). Unless notability shown, delete. --Nlu (talk) 01:52, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The Chinese article, while not without problems of its own, suggests notability ( cf. [1]). He's also quoted in western media, from the BBC to the New York Post. I am not sure whether this adds up to WP notability, but he appears to be a well-known academic and opinion-maker in China. 188.216.192.206 (talk) 06:22, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:55, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:55, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:55, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment he does seem to have a bit of coverage in Western media, such as this article on The Irish Times about him winning a lawsuit against a Chinese internet company which tried to censor his website. Seems to be borderline notable, but this could go either way. -Zanhe (talk) 07:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:42, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Viztor (talk) 02:54, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I do see there are plenty reliable sources quoting him. Viztor (talk) 05:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.