Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Houthoff Buruma The Game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:08, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Houthoff Buruma The Game

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded multiple times. No reliable sources added by the author. The author himself is a suspected COI case. The article, after considerable time given to the author to improve it, is still not notable. Request AfD delete. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 20:02, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No real notability established with sources. No hits on search through reliable sources. The game exists and may have all the best intentions, but it cannot be properly sourced. The article promotes the company more than it addresses the game. — Hellknowz ▎talk 17:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No reliable sources, let alone any with any significant coverage. Fails WP:RS and WP:N --Teancum (talk) 11:42, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable sources showing that this meets the notability guidelines. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 16:13, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails basic notability requirements for lack of reliable sources. It may get some coverage through the World Expo appearance, but it may not; the article can be recreated if it does. --McGeddon (talk) 16:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.