Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotel Osijek
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 17:07, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hotel Osijek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 16:45, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article was speedied as A7 at the start of June. It was recreated today with the same content, and so I re-nominated it as A7. Armbrust (talk · contribs) removed the CSD template, with the rationale that A7 doesn't apply to buildings. I think the article is about a company, of which the building is a part. Ultimately, this company fails WP:GNG. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 16:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per G4 Seasider91 (talk) 18:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Seasider, {{db-g4}} is only used for a page that was previously deleted via a deletion discussion, which this wasn't. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:27, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 17:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete This article can't decide whether it's about the company or the building. In either case, it's an A7. Zaldax (talk) 19:25, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.