Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Topic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedball Keep (as in, it received a SNOW's worth of SK votes. (non-admin closure) Jclemens (talk) 04:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hot Topic[edit]

lacks sources, very messy, editors are removing any form of criticism section, generally un-notable, etc. DragonDance (talk) 00:42, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep large chain. I was in one today! JJL (talk) 01:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep National retail chain with a very strong presence in malls. Hard name to Google, but I'm sure there're some good sources out there, like this and this. I wouldn't go into one if you paid me, but still, I'd say a chain with 690+ stores has a fair whack of notability. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. It's listed on the NASDAQ!--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 02:36, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep a big notable chain. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 03:08, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep It's clearly notable, even if the article needs fixing. Doug Weller (talk) 04:13, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.