Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Desert Knights

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hot Desert Knights

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't know if searches are being filtered, but I'm not seeing any evidence of notability. Adam9007 (talk) 23:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was unable to find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources of this porn video company. The article in its current form fails our core content policy Verifiability. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:25, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no indications of notability or significance. Sourced offered in the article does not take this page past A7. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not even a legitimate assertion of notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 23:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the claims in the article have absolutely no significance for actual notability itself, therefore with the few pieces of information, there's essentially nothing else. SwisterTwister talk 05:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 23:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.