Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HotCopper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 21:24, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HotCopper[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website failing WP:NWEB. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete definitely appears as though this page is advertisement. Non-notable also. EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk) 05:40, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:14, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:14, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:14, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – See WP:NEXIST. The topic passes WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:WEBCRIT, as evidenced by simply using the Find sources template atop this discussion and then reading the articles. Promotional tone can be addressed by copy editing the article (I added a Press release-section template to the article). Source examples include, but are not limited to those listed below. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

The Sydney Morning Herald
The Sydney Morning Herald
Perth Now
The Western Australian
Financial Review
Australasian Business Intelligence (subscription required)
Australasian Business Intelligence (subscription required)
Australasian Business Intelligence (subscription required)
Australasian Business Intelligence (subscription required)

Keep It's about to be listed again on the ASX, is a notable Australian website, and has plenty of independent significant coverage, as listed above and in the article. The-Pope (talk) 15:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -The topic's press coverage supports notability and since it's about to be a publicly traded company, so I think the deletion discussion is a little premature, though the article's content could be improved Burroughs'10 (talk) 18:01, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.