Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hostmate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:18, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hostmate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTDICT Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 13:43, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per nom. furthermore, a google search seems to say that this isn't even how the word is used generally, and that the subject of the article is not notable in any of its meanings. Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:38, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:38, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- delete why in the world does Wikipedia let new users create articles on their first edit? What a waste of our time, as well as new editors.</rant> W Nowicki (talk) 17:26, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a dictionary.SwisterTwister talk 20:48, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.