Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horse Ranch Mountain
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep nancy (talk) 18:39, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Horse Ranch Mountain[edit]
- Horse Ranch Mountain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable Ratagonia (talk) 02:32, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Horse Ranch Mountain is the highest summit in Zion National Park, but - it is on the northern border, has no active trail to the summit, is rarely climbed and not particularly photogenic. That it is the highest point is covered in the Zion National Park article. A road goes close to the summit, but goes through posted private land and thus is not open to the public. All said, not notable. Ratagonia (talk) 02:39, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The mountain is inherently notable for what it is: the highest summit in Zion National Park. See media coverage at http://www.cedarcityreview.com/articles.php?id=4609&art_title=Kolob_Canyons_a_Close_Retreat and at http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Horse+Ranch+Mountain%22 --Eastmain (talk) 03:40, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Has secondary sources that show notability. Kevin (talk) 03:46, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. As Zion's high point, it certainly is notable. Note that, of Utah's five national parks, this is the only one whose high point has an article (see List of U.S. National Parks by elevation). In my opinion, the only one of that group whose high point does not warrant an article is Capitol Reef, although one could be made for nearby Billings Pass.ArcticBartek (talk) 20:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:40, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.