Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hope in transition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:10, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hope in transition[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A prime example of why WP:A7 should apply to unremarkable musical recordings and not just those whose parent articles don't exist. Laun chba ller 21:18, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:NALBUMS. Maybe someday it'll be notable enough for a stand-alone article (like James's other two albums [1] [2]), but it's just too soon. —Lucas Thoms, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 03:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Web searches indicate that it exists, but not that it is notable. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:20, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.