Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hope Runs High Films

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:05, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hope Runs High Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable distribution company, fails WP:GNG, no WP:RS. Meeanaya (talk) 04:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 04:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 04:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Additional support articles should be forthcoming in the coming weeks. Company was reconfigured out of the Karmic Release Ltd library, hence the Karmic Release citations in references. -HauntedMill

Ref to "fails WP:GNG" I feel that the cultural value of the film's represented by the company, and that dedication to filmmakers with minority voices certainly constitute notability. Ref to WP:RS Icon Magazine, Variety and The New York Times are certainly reliable sources. - Lwottring

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 23:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - this is not a film production company, but a film distribution company with no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources - all the references are to films they distribute, none are about the company itself - notability can't be inherited from the films they distribute - Epinoia (talk) 02:56, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.