Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hootan Ahmadi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hootan Ahmadi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional page created to promote a non notable bio. Aksnahar (talk) 16:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Page was created without {{afd2}} template and never transcluded to a daily log. One of a series of malformed nominations by an account with few edits. Fixed now--I offer no opinion on the nomination itself at this time. --Finngall ^talk 17:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete minor businessman who comes no where near notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:04, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 01:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 ^talk 15:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 15:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. The Evening Standard profile from 2013 [1] appears to be significant coverage in a reasonably reliable source, but the other sources either don't appear reliable or the coverage is not significant, so the subject probably just fails WP:BASIC. Qwfp (talk) 12:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The coverage I am seeing is very sparse (except for the one source linked above). There are quite a few trivial mentions, but overall it fails GNG. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- non notable subject. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.