Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong and Far East Masonic Benevolence Fund (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus amongst policy backed reasons that NORG is not met Nosebagbear (talk) 13:22, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong and Far East Masonic Benevolence Fund

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No references. Imcdc (talk) 02:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 02:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 02:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 02:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article doesn't provide a claim to notability, nor are there adequate sources cited to support notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Since this was created by legislation, it's certainly possible that there was WP:SIGCOV associated with the passing of the law, but I can't actually find any news articles that would suggest that this were true. Based upon the evidence I can find, I favor deletion, though I'd be willing to reconsider if someone can find contemporary coverage of this. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A statutory organisation. 1.64.48.231 (talk) 14:32, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment statutory organisation is not a valid reason . Please read WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Matthew hk (talk) 15:31, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete could not find any third party sources to meet WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 23:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.