Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong Study Circle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. The potential exists for this to find its way back to mainspace, but that assumes sufficient WP:RS are found. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong Study Circle[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wholly unsourced article. I am not finding any indepth coverage in reliable secondary sources. Nothing is claimed that might promote notability. Fails WP:ORG. Just Chilling (talk) 21:58, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Matthew hk (talk) 08:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. According to their official site, it seem the members of the society are from Canada, UK and Hong Kong which they have meetings. I am not sure it have WP:GNG notability which seem lack of secondary source made an in-depth reporting about this interest group. Current content borderline G11, especially it is not encyclopedic to know how much is the membership fee. Matthew hk (talk) 08:59, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify. Google throws up references to this group, although not really from high-quality sources; however, there might be something here. Regardless, no references mean that this should be "draftified" until a properly referenced article is produced. Britishfinance (talk) 11:26, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination and graciously return to sender. -The Gnome (talk) 05:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.