Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honasa Consumer Pvt Limited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Honasa Consumer Pvt Limited

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company exists... But so what? The references appear to be WP:ROUTINE coverage of business transactions in India. There is nothing here to indicate why this particular babycare and skincare company is notable enough to warrant an article. Also, I suspect the author may have an undeclared WP:COI given that he/ she has only 62 edits, yet produced this article fully-formed with structured references and categories to boot. This ain't no noob. A loose necktie (talk) 07:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete routine coverage, potential COI is a concern. Oaktree b (talk) 13:50, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Oh, good grief - FOUR paragraphs of "the company raised..." Routine funding rounds, WP:SERIESA, fails WP:NCORP Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Before publishing this article, Creator has also produced another article Dilip Buildcon in 2021 and that is also fully-formed with structured references. But i can see Honasa is a notable company found its presence on many news articles. Isn't it? 2409:4050:2E16:4626:EC0E:25C2:A615:CE18 (talk) 14:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.