Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy molé
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 19:18, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Holy molé (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable comic. Prod was removed, and some claims added, but I can't find any reliable independent sources about the comic. There are no Google News results[1], and only 22 Google hits in total[2], of which some dozen are about the comic. The comic exists and is published in one small newspaper, but hasn't been remarked upon by reliable sources independent of the author or the publishers. Fram (talk) 08:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom Virek (talk) 08:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The lack of independent sources shows that it is not notable. Artene50 (talk) 09:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There doesn't seem to be any major independent coverage about the comic that shows it warrants coverage in wikipedia. Seraphim♥Whipp 16:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete — Per, everything above. ♌β(uh oh. someone's mad) 19:01, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nom makes excellent points. I have nothing to add beyond their analysis. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 17:42, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.