Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy Cross Polish National Catholic Church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:05, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Holy Cross Polish National Catholic Church[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I can tell, this church does not exist. "Third and Queen" in Pe Ell must refer to West Queen Avenue and South Third Street, where there is no church. The coordinates given in the article are slightly north-east of that corner in a field. While there are links to the National REgister of Historic Places, those documents give only the "Third and Queen" address. https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/GetAsset/NRHP/87001456_text Mikeblas (talk) 14:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The mystery is solved here: "Pe Ell Says Farewell to Historic Polish Church. CHURCH RAZED: Community Sad to See One-of-a-Kind Historic Building Torn Down", Centralia Chronicle, March 5, 2010. Per WP:NTEMP, the article should be updated and kept. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Nomination based on a misunderstanding; no deletion reason presented. -- 101.117.57.200 (talk) 02:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The nominator's concern has been addressed, and properties which have been listed on the National Register of Historic Places are considered notable. I've added the site to WikiProject NRHP's list of errors in the National Register Information System for future reference. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 18:48, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.