Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holotecture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Holotecture

Delete nn neologism Mayalld (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Appears to be a concept originated and promoted solely by Bruno Uhr, without gaining much traction. Google turns up no notice unconnected with Uhr or any discussions in wider media. Acroterion _(talk) 18:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No notability outside of a (presumably) non-notable book which I suspect this article is attempted to promote. If it's of any relevance, this page was repeatedly created and deleted in 2007, which isn't additional grounds for deletion, but makes me wonder. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Please Check google link.[1] There are plenty references of Holotecture. Use 'Urh' for search term not 'uhr' and also bear in mind that we talk about a Term that was created by Slovenian Architect and therefore majority of references are in Slovenian language (pedrieni)ArhiMan (talk) 18:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- See WP:NOTE if you haven't already. Notability is significant coverage in reliable independent secondary sources. Google hits don't count, especially when most or all of the hits appears to be written by the author of the book. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:35, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, term doesn't appear to have gained any notice in other authors' works (nothing really on Google Books or Google Scholar, for example). Bruno Urh himself may or may not be notable; if he is, then a brief mention of this concept could be merged into his biography. --Delirium (talk) 19:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Shoester (talk) 21:54, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.