Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollie Robertson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hollie Robertson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources do not suggest notability, fails WP:GNG Devoke water 00:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Devoke water 00:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Devoke water 00:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Devoke water 00:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Devoke water 00:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Devokewater, did you "Search for additional sources" before nominating the article for deletion, as required? Your comment suggests that you did not, and fails to acknowledge that "if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability". Had you conducted such a search, you would have found plenty of sources. Examples: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8. --Usernameunique (talk) 22:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I googled + researched her. --Devoke water 22:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article needs to be rewritten with better sources. But a cursory search suggests WP:SIGCOV. Will work on incorporating some this week. Redoryxx (talk) 10:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, clearly passes WP:GNG. SailingInABathTub (talk) 11:50, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree that this passes WP:GNG. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She meets notability criteria and via Google I found a wide number of credible news media based sources documenting her dancing and contest career. The article should be re-written a bit, fleshed out, and more sources added. I believe WP:SIGCOV comes into play. Hollie Robertson definitely seems to be notable enough to merit inclusion, but better and more sources are needed. KJS ml343x (talk) 17:03, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She is notable and passes WP:GNG but agree that the page could be improved. Stuhunter83 (talk) 23:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Evidently a notable dancer as per WP:GNG. No Swan So Fine (talk) 15:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.