Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holiday Cheer Daisy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW DELETE. There literally is not a snowball's chance in Hell this article would survive the AfD process.. JIP | Talk 21:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday Cheer Daisy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor video game character. No references, no WP:significant coverage in WP:reliable sources. Mostly seems to have been derived from a fandom.com wiki noq (talk) 16:58, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Princess Daisy. Not independently notable. Please note that the article creator has removed the AfD notice from the article. Spiderone 17:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as others have correctly stated, there is nothing worth keeping from this article. It is entirely original research and the subject is not notable anyway. Spiderone 20:47, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's hardly even worth a re-direct. This is just a costume change. You'd never find enough sources to establish independant notability of a costume change. This appears to be mostly a copy/paste from the "We Are Daisy Wikia", which purports to be "the #1 support group for all fans of Princess Daisy." I think maybe it should have stayed there. ApLundell (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG with no sources. KidAd talk 17:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An article about a video game character with a different set of clothes is definitely not going to be notable. Copypasted from another wiki and creator is now blocked on Commons. Dylsss (talk) 19:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There is absolutely nothing that should be merged, as not only is it entirely unsourced, but most of the information here seems to either be WP:OR or plain WP:MADEUP. And I agree with ApLundell above that this is not even worth a Redirect. Rorshacma (talk) 19:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - totally not notable -- Whpq (talk) 22:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - literally a pallet-swap and nothing more, it is in no way notable, and actually has completely false information. I would even consider salting. It is that bad. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:11, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's a costume for Daisy in Mario Kart Tour and nothing else. Everything else in this article is made up. The costume is too minor to mention in Daisy's article. Reach Out to the Truth 04:54, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all the way. This article is definitely biting the dust but I just had to remove that inane "biography". Good Lord. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 09:19, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable video game character. It's not even an original character but just a costume swap. JIP | Talk 10:05, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Not only is the entire article completely unsourced, little more than the first paragraph contains anything more than either gamecruft or something the author invented by themselves. JIP | Talk 00:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, have you noticed that the entire article has only ever had one wikilink: London? JIP | Talk 12:09, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 18:16, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Wow, that's bad. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:52, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, An article with no references and no sign of notability. Alex-h (talk) 07:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per the nom. Pahiy (talk) 01:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - how many deletes are needed before WP:SNOW applies? Spiderone 17:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.