Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holds of Pern (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Holds of Pern[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional location. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Pure WP:PLOT. Fails GNG/NFICTION. AfD few years back was closed as keep with no prejudice to merge. Not sure what to merge, as almost nothing is referenced. And why keep, if it fails notability policies? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:26, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:26, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails NFICTION/GNG. No shred of analysis. Kacper IV (talk) 12:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:41, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete pure fancruft, fails WP:GNG._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:45, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Completely non-notable, trivial minutia. TTN (talk) 16:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Jack Upland (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.