Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holden All-Australian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Holden All-Australian[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unofficial, hardly used term = a total lack of notability. No better sources found, just some passing mentions. Fram (talk) 11:00, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Transportation, and Australia. Fram (talk) 11:00, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the lone cited source doesn't even support the usage in the article. The words "Holden All Australian" don't even appear in that order. PianoDan (talk) 17:44, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet notability guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 01:37, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Non notable term. Cabrils (talk) 03:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.