Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoe railway station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Redirecting is preferable to deletion if possible.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hoe railway station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is one of a number of loose proposals for community stations along the Mid-Norfolk Railway. There is now no plan to build this station, although future options may arise. Until and unless there is an actual plan to build this station it remains totally speculative. It could be recreated should the plan be revived - but as stands there is not even enough factual basis for forking content to parent page. DiverScout (talk) 14:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 January 10. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 14:40, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Surprisingly I can't find any sources at all to even verify its existence, so will have to say Delete but wouldn't mind it being recreated once something concrete crops up. –Davey2010^Talk 20:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mid Norfolk Railway - there's definitely been mention of this is the heritage rail press. Can be turned into an article if/when building starts. Mjroots (talk) 23:41, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- A redirect cold make sense - although there is no verifiable content to fork, so there would be nothing to add to the MNR page. There is a single sentence mention on the North Elmham railway station page which would be a better redirect, I think, if that was chosen as the way to go. DiverScout (talk) 09:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to most suitable target, probably the rail line for which this station is a proposed addition. --do ncr am 00:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.