Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hockeyburgh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 19:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hockeyburgh[edit]

Non-notable nickname; likely original research or simply made up. A Google search for Hockeyburgh only yields 3 hits (1 blog, 1 message board) while one for Hockeytown, a nickname it is compared to, yields 464,000. TheMile (talk) 02:54, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as original research hoax. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 02:59, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Either a hoax or completely non-notable. Nsk92 (talk) 03:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not an unreasonable nickname but without reliable sources to demonstrate its use, i'm going to wave WP:MADEUP at it.~ mazca ^talk 11:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Almost G3-able in my book ... only thing that kept me from hitting the speedy button was because of those hits. If any admin more rougish than even I am is inclined to delete it, I won't object. Also tagged with {{hoax}} and warned the author. Blueboy 96 18:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. So lame, it made me want to hockey up a burg and spit it out. "Hey, man, the Penguins are so good, they oughta call Pittsburgh... uh.. uh.. HOCKEYburgh!!!" Powerfully imaginative. Mandsford (talk) 20:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No eveidence of notability provided, none found. Probably WP:MADEUP. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.