Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about a non-notable law firm. I think we've deleted articles about law firms larger than this before. Most of the search results I see are press releases. Rusf10 (talk) 04:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable, references are all to the company website or directory listings (plus one deadlink). Smallbones_(smalltalk) 23:13, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as PROMO. Major regional law firm; an article could probably be sourced drawing on news coverage of firm readily found in regional papers and on articles about the firms role in notable cases. There should be no prejudice against re-creating an article in this firm sourced to on reliable, secondary sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:53, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.