Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hizon–Ocampo House
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Schminnte [talk to me] 17:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Hizon–Ocampo House[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hizon–Ocampo House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Challenged for references since 2009. GNews, GScholar, Gbooks and GNews Archives turns out negative results. Google turned a 2013 website whose text was lifted from the 2011 iteration of this article -- Lenticel (talk) 07:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Lenticel (talk) 07:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not really decisive but I also found this and this, but enough that I don’t feel comfortable with deleting. Mccapra (talk) 21:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Several structures in the San Fernando Heritage District have been marked by the National Historical Institute (now known as the National Historical Commission of the Philippines) as heritage houses, because of the architectural significance and also their current state of preservation. This is one of them. Djflem (talk) 22:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Filipino heritage listing is a bit confusing, but this would suggest that it is heritage listed. It therefore meets WP:GEOFEAT. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Necrothesp. Mccapra (talk) 11:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:GEOFEAT per Djflem's argument. SBKSPP (talk) 23:55, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.