Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiwot Mamo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Insufficient discussion, but WP:BLP is determinative here: this BLP article is sourced only to a WP:SPS and a dead link of unclear quality. Sandstein 17:20, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hiwot Mamo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no evidence that Miss Ethiopia is a title of enough notability that the winner is default notable, and no evidence than any of Mamo's other actions rise to the level of notability John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss Universe Ethiopia as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Regarding redirect to Miss Universe Ethiopia, the subject is listed in the article. However that content is currently unsourced along with almost all of the other content. Gab4gab (talk) 11:59, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:48, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.