Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitwicket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hitwicket[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricket game (among the top 2,500 websites in India). Sources are self-published or not reliable (refs 4 and 6). Refs 3 and 7 are the same source, and only contains a short summary from The Hindu. Google search shows only founder announcements, blogs and game forum posts. Overall not enough independent in-depth coverage from reliable sources. GermanJoe (talk) 21:41, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 01:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 01:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I see nothing obviously better. Pinging Czar. SwisterTwister talk 01:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) I'm counting the ¶ in The Hindu and the promotional Yahoo News India post. The article topic had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets (fantasy cricket leagues?) If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 02:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.