Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitch50.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Stifle (talk) 18:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hitch50.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
192.93.8.247 (talk) 11:19, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]1) 0 references
2) was not original idea, many came before, many after
3) last line of entry really useless and is irrelevant, proves goal was attention and money for both projects
4) most of the information in the entry is irrelevant, history of the people involved? they met Robin Williams? wow, is this what Wikipedia has degraded to?
- KEEP: if you are going to keep one red paperclip too. WillC (talk) 11:58, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Shameless promotion of a non-notable website. Being "featured" as a human-interest blurb is not the same as receiving non-trivial attention which doesn't count for notability per WP:WEB. Just mentioning the website and its premise is not good enough. Themfromspace (talk) 00:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:01, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The difference between this and one red paperclip is that one red paperclip has sources; This one does not. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 18:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.