Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historyism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted (most recently) by User:Just Chilling under criterion WP:G11. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 23:04, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Historyism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable WP:WEBSITE, cannot find any secondary sources on this subject. Cubbie15fan (talk) 20:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete non notable (A7), spam (G11) and copyvio (G12). It has already been deleted today as non-notable and the new article still gives no indication to the contrary. It is written in a promotional way, and is a copyvio of the website itself. A7 was apparently contested when this AfD was raised but I have tagged G11 and G12. RichardOSmith (talk) 21:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable history blog with no support from reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 23:30, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.