Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical development of Ganesha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Historical development of Ganesha[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since the text is copy-paste of "Rise to prominence" in Ganesha and Ganesha became a FA with that text, the article is redundant. Though there was a consensus for the formation on Talk:Ganesha/Archive_5#What_this_article_needs_-imo for it's formation and the article was created on 29 September 2007. There has no major expansions since then. I raised this issue once on Talk:Historical development of Ganesha long back in 2008. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:19, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. this is virtually identical with the original article and i dont see how this can be expanded further--Sodabottle (talk) 15:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Duplicate article. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 15:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 01:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a great example of why speedy criterion A10 was introduced. This is too old for A10, but it should be deleted for the same reasons. Nyttend (talk) 19:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Shruti14 ^{talk • sign} 12:43, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.