Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiragana and katakana place names

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Maliner (talk) 19:59, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hiragana and katakana place names[edit]

Hiragana and katakana place names (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since it was created 18 years ago. On its face it looks like a textbook case of WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and I can't find anything which talks about this at all. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Japanese article discusses this topic in greater depth. There have been municipal summits about this topic. There have been political disputes over the use of hiragana or katakana writing for place names (instead of the more traditional kanji).
--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 22:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Care to add any of those sources? The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
From the Japanese Wikipedia article:
Regards,
--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 04:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here's another one:
  • Hosokawa, Naoko (5 February 2021). "Katakana and Japanese National Identity. The Use of Katakana for Japanese Names and Expressions" (PDF). Silva Iaponicarum (56–59): 119. doi:10.12775/sijp.2020.56-59.7. Retrieved 1 November 2023.
--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 05:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy close per A. B.. Cavarrone 07:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per new sources. FOARP (talk) 11:10, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment It's clear that there should be an article with this name, but I have my doubts about whether this will become an adequate article on the subject. Mangoe (talk) 13:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep surprisingly enough, seems to pass GNG. AryKun (talk) 13:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.