Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hip-hop hug

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. There's a 70% majority for deletion but the keep votes make reasonable arguments. — JIP | Talk 06:32, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hip-hop hug

dicdef WCFrancis 04:05, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. --.::Imdaking::. ^{Bow | DOWN} 04:24, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. dicdef. utcursch | talk 08:05, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable greeting. Kappa 10:32, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete dicdef. Olorin28 16:34, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. nn dicdef neologism. Andrew pmk | Talk 17:26, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge What are these acronyms you people are using?! The term is a neologism, but so is "internet." The greeting is a highly standardized and widespread custom in certain social groups. We have an article on the V sign. Why not one on the hug? (Sorry, forgot to sign) Haiduc 00:21, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: dicdef = dictionary definition (as opposed to an encyclopedic article); nn = non-notable. I don't know that the term "hip-hop hug" is in common use (only 450 Google hits) but it does appear to be in use (see [1] for example). --Metropolitan90 23:25, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you. It is to be hoped that the article will grow beyond its "dictionary definition" stage, right now it is just a rudimentary stub, but is not how a lot of articles start out? Haiduc 00:21, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Dicdef. Job E 6 00:50, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as dicdef Tuf-Kat 02:44, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Dicdef, pure and simple. Take it to the Wiktionary. / Peter ^Isotalo 04:01, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Already slightly more than a dicdef, can be expanded further. Jkelly 05:02, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above comment. ··gracefool |☺ 17:52, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.