Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hina Baig

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz talk 03:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hina Baig[edit]

Hina Baig (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage found. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 08:08, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete Busy in various commissions and work groups, but I don't believe her responsibilities create sufficient notability. Only woman Senior Research Scientist in [dept division] doesn't really carry a lot of weight either, sorry. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.