Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himezawa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Himezawa[edit]

Himezawa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although there are 21 citations, almost all of them are to the article-subject's website, blogs, forums and other low-quality sources. This source looks to be in German maybe? I have skimmed it and the only mention of Himezawa appears to be in the caption of the image. CorporateM (Talk) 02:48, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 03:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 03:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The reliability of the sources is very poor; I am not seeing anything from mainstream sources - blogs, primary sources, etc. At best, it's the "too soon", at worst it's another vanity piece of a social media wannabe-star. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:03, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no reliable sources demonstrating that the subject meets the WP:BIO guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 16:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Nothing in the article seems to rise to the level of RS. I tried a Google.de search and all I found were also non-reliable or self-generated sources (aside from a notice some have been removed under the Right to be Forgotten thing). It looks like this person is known in a rather small niche and has not had any significant coverage in mainstream media. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 16:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 19:06, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 19:06, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.