Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himanee Bhatia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 09:37, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Himanee Bhatia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested draftification. Negligible improvement since it was returned to draft. Fails WP:NACTOR, fails WP:NAUTHOR 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:37, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and India. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:37, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sources are trivial / non-RS. The article claimed that she had won the Dadasaheb Phalke Award, which would have been a sign of notability, but that's not correct (she evidently won one of the multiple copycat awards which are not notable). --bonadea contributions talk 19:50, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment looks well-sourced with RS, unsure how useful they are though. Oaktree b (talk) 22:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Does not satisfy acting notability or general notability. None of the roles listed in the filmography are major roles. A review of the references shows that many of them are interviews, and none of them are secondary coverage.

Reference Number	Reference	Comments	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	hindustanitimes.com	An interview	No	Yes	Yes	No
2	newindianexpress.com	Announcement of a film	No	Yes	Yes	No
3	timesofindia.com	An interview	No	Yes	No	No
4	lehren.com	Promotional piece about one of her books	No	Yes	Yes	No
5	amazon.in	Page for one of her poetry books	No	No	N/A	No
6	mid-day.com	Another interview, about her career	No	Yes	Maybe	No
7	outlookindia.com	Blocked by antimalware
8	zeenews.india.com	Review of Decoupled	Yes	Not about subject	Yes	No
9	indianewengland.com	Another interview	No	Yes	Probably	No
10	tribuneindia.com	And another interview	No	Yes	Yes	No
11	cinemaexpress.com	An interview about one of her films	No	Yes	Yes	No
12	glamsham.com	Yet another interview	No	Yes	Yes	No
13	perfectwomanmagainzeandevents.com	Blurb about a phony award.	No	Yes	Probably not	No

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon Thanks for doing the work of going through the cites. I'm not sure, however, why you refer to the Dadasaheb Phalke Award as phony. Although it is not a reliable source, Dadasaheb Phalke Award states that it is the "highest award in the field of cinema" in India. I can't attest to that, but an internet search on "Dadasaheb Phalke Awards himanee" retrieves many sources. Some are re-hashes of what was probably a press release, but I see enough secondary sources to give me the idea that the wp article is not entirely off base. Lamona (talk) 01:40, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to User:Lamona - See the above comment by User:Bonadea, and see Dadasaheb_Phalke_Award#Similarly_named_awards. She is not a winner of the authentic Dadasheb Phalke Award, and it appears that any claim to that effect is promotional. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:09, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Due to source analysis by Robert McClenon. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:58, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.