Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilton Sisters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was (presumed speedy as AfD tag is already removed) keep. - Mailer Diablo 12:37, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Hilton Sisters

Nominating for deletion. I don't think a disamibuation page for only two people who are already easily recognizable is really necesary. --Fallout boy 02:17, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Prior to my nominating for deletion, this disambig was only for Paris and Nicky Hilton. Now that the hilton twins have been added to it, I change my vote to keep.--Fallout boy 01:51, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. Not sure if this would be better off redirecting to Hilton twins (like Hilton sisters does), or whether that should be added to this disambig. If the former, Paris and Nicky should be mentioned in a disambig line there; if the latter, this should be moved over the Hilton sisters redirect. —Cryptic (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Move to Hilton sisters per below. —Cryptic (talk) 18:46, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Hilton Twins should be a redirect to Hilton sisters as the latter term easily wins on the Google duel test see [1]

  A page is useful in case as it would be a commonly searched term and both sisters are well-known. Keep with possible move to Hilton sisters with Hilton twins redirecting to Hilton sisters. Capitalistroadster 10:01, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

  • Where would the content currently at Hilton twins move to, then? The vast majority of those hits for "Hilton sisters" aren't for them, but for Nicky and Paris (who aren't twins, so a redirect from "hilton twins" shouldn't go to a disambig including their articles). —Cryptic (talk) 11:01, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  • In that case, Hilton twins can be left alone but Hilton sisters should redirect to this article with the Hilton twins added to the disambiguation. Capitalistroadster 11:15, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep disambig. As suggested, I made hilton sisters re-direct here. I'm sure most using that term nowadays, want the new girls, and not the old ones; but it's harmless to mention them all. --rob 12:10, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep disambig per above. 23skidoo 14:19, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep --MacRusgail 16:48, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep The fact that there is another set of once famous/still notable Hilton sisters proves the need. Marskell 09:43, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Obvious keep at this point. --Jacquelyn Marie 03:16, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.