Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilary Weaver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hilary Weaver

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a musician, not reliably sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The strongest notability claim here is winning awards that aren't prominent enough to pass NMUSIC #8, and are "referenced" solely to those awards' own self-published websites about themselves rather than any evidence that they get enough media coverage to confer notability on their winners -- and besides that, the only other source here (now deadlinked) was her own self-published PR on the website of her own record label, and even on a ProQuest search for older coverage I just get a small handful of glancing namechecks of her existence in sources that aren't about her in any non-trivial way, with absolutely nothing substantive enough to count toward getting her over WP:GNG. Note also that I'm bundling her album, which is also an entirely primary-sourced article that fails to even provide a track listing. Absolutely nothing stated in either article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass WP:GNG on the sourcing. Bearcat (talk) 03:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:39, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, sparse coverage and does not meet any notability criteria. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:TOOSOON for this singer to have her own article. I could not find any reliable secondary sourcing that helps her qualify for WP:GNG. Missvain (talk) 20:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.