Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highway (C.O.P.S.)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 18:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Highway (C.O.P.S.)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A minor character without any reliable third person sources or notability it should be merged or deleted

Dwanyewest (talk) 21:12, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There's no indication that this character, who appeared in a cartoon that was only broadcast for 1 year, is notable. --Griseum (talk) 15:45, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Consists entirely of original research based on youtube videos. Pcap ping 06:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
merge adequately. --information is verifiable, being based as it should be on the fiction itself. DGG ( talk ) 05:57, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its's merely a vehicle for a overdetailed plot summary and like many of the other C.O.P.S. character articles you can't allow User submitted YouTube videos as evidence a subject is notable unless its official YouTube videos. I see no evidence the videos are sanctioned by DIC Entertainment see guidelines WP:YOUTUBE

Dwanyewest (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as character appeared both on TV and as a toy, which we can of course verify and see for ourselves. As nominator suggests, it could be merged, which is what we do per WP:BEFORE and WP:PRESERVE. Deletion is an extreme last resort, but clearly the character is notable to fans of the show and toy collectors, hence the images we can see of it online and that an article was created here. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 00:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Excessive plot summary and original research based upon a handful of youtube videos. Reyk _YO! 08:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, then Redirect to C.O.P.S. to annihilate pure WP:PLOT regurgitation. Abductive (reasoning) 08:11, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.