Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highland Hills Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Highland Hills Mall[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN 2-dozen-store (article claims 170,000 sq. ft.) shopping mall. In addition to it not being notable, the consensus, as reflected in the discussion at "Common Outcomes; Malls", is that we don't generally retain stand-alone articles of malls below 500K sq. ft. (some editors believe the cutoff is a higher square footage). Epeefleche (talk) 03:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The discussion at WP:OUTCOMES contains no examples of AfD discussions that support the claims of the nomination. Unscintillating (talk) 22:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Twice before the start of the AfD, the nominator has removed material from the article instead of adding Template:CN tags. Unscintillating (talk) 22:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The total GLA is 229,000 sqft as per www.arcturusrealty.com. On the icsc.org categories, this appears to be a "Community Center ('Large Neighborhood Center')". A picture from [1] and this map indicate that 15 of the 25 stores are accessible from an inside walkway. Unscintillating (talk) 22:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Alternate search terms include Highland Hills Shopping Mall and Highland Hill Mall. Unscintillating (talk) 22:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Searches at Google books, Google newspaper, as well as Google web did not turn up WP:GNG coverage of this topic. Google images revealed the leasing agent (Arcturus). This is the kind of non-notable that goes beyond WP:N to WP:Deletion policy. Unscintillating (talk) 22:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Kitchener, Ontario as a reasonable WP:ATD. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Relisting comment: I originally closed this but again too early, So have relisted.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 11:31, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete It comes down to the usual issue for shopping centers: there's nothing to say. It was built; it has an address; it has stores. The end. Indeed, more of the article is devoted to the adjacent transit center than the to shopping center. there's no notability here beyond a retail guide. Mangoe (talk) 12:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete First 3 sources are directory listings and the last 2 are about transit terminals, not the mall. found nothing in google. Fails WP:GNG. Me5000 (talk) 16:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I could find no evidence of reliable sources to establish the notability of this mall. ArcAngel (talk) ) 15:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.