Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High reach influencer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

High reach influencer

This term was "coined in 2008". The article was created by the coiner of the phrase, and the phrase gets 8 Google hits. Entirely non-notable. DJ Clayworth (talk) 14:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wholly non-notable, and poorly referenced. I don't think there's anything in the article which could be salvaged. -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 15:06, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is borderline speedy deletion material, since I strongly suspect that this article is covert spam: an article defining someone's newly minted marketing buzzword. But the article is well written in reasonably clear English, so I'll give it the benefit of due process. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Throw in a little COI, as it seems the original author of the piece is the same person as being credited with coining the phrase, I say delete. ShoesssS ^Talk 15:55, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable WP:OR --T-rex 16:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:56, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.