Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiesville

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, withdrawn by nominator. (Non-admin closure) 28bytes (talk) 07:22, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hiesville

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Makes no indication of significance. Does not contain references. Mr. R00t ^Talk 01:23, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Named populated areas satisfy the criteria for inclusion as a stand-alone article if identified by a government source. No further indication of significance is required. It's a stub. Anyway, I just added some references and info. Have a look. patsw (talk) 02:25, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. I'd ask at this point for some uninvolved admin to close now as it no longer has the problems it started with. It no longer needs to be deleted. Mr. R00t ^Talk 03:35, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Verifiable populated places are considered notable, as has been established by countless AfDs prior to this one. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 02:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep None of the problems I originally saw are there anymore. Thank you TheCatalyst31 for explaining that notability thing to me. And thanks Patsw for fixing the article and finding sources. Mr. R00t ^Talk 03:35, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.