Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hidden Trails Escondido
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Escondido, California. Some merging may be possible.Black Kite 23:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hidden Trails Escondido (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable subdivision in Escondido, California. No third-party sources exist for this place to have a legitimate claim at being an established neighborhood, and it appears to only be a recently-built housing development. The only references I could find to it are the homeowners' association website and various real estate listings, neither of which are reliable thrid-party sources or have content which would establish notability. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 20:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is a 290-unit development within a city of more than 120,000 population. Not even big enough to qualify as a neighborhood IMO, and zero news coverage or outside sourcing. I do a lot of work on articles about neighborhoods in the San Diego area, and this one would never rate an article in my book. --MelanieN (talk) 22:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 09:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Escondido, California. Not notable enought for its own page, but this doesn't mean that the information can't have a place anywhere. Merging of information to this target is possible. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.